Testing the Inefficient Supervision Hypothesis: Will be United Kingdom Mergers and Acquisitions Disciplinary? Essay

Auzius Kazombo Mwale

Department of Accounting & Finance

Tests the inefficient management speculation: Are British mergers and acquisitions disciplinary? This thesis is provided in fulfilment of the requirements

of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy with the University of Stirling Might 2007

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to thank numerous people to which I was indebted to get assisting me personally in making this thesis. I am greatly delinquent to Professor Robin Limmack for helping me while using groundwork in this study. I am tremendously indebted to Dr Kevin Campbell, my personal principal manager for his continuous support and guidance throughout the length of study. I would to thank the Faculty of Administration and the Division of Accounting and Finance at the College or university of Stirling for moral support, with no which completing this examine on time may not be achieved. I would really like to appreciate Roy Baker, the research associate in the Office for aiding with workplace back up. This kind of thesis is definitely dedicated to my teachers, especially Mr Chagwesha, who taught me to study and write in my first grade class way back in 1967. I would like to thank Goodness, and people of my loved ones for the support I actually received during my difficult hours throughout the duration of my stay at College or university of Stirling. i

ABSTRACT

A large body system of studies have examined the effect of takeovers on corporate and business performance. Although there has been a considerable volume of study on the wealth effects of takeovers to date, there has been very little facts on the disciplinary role. The essence this analyze is to help the takeover argument by evaluating whether UK takeovers are disciplinary. This kind of study replicates previous results on if the market pertaining to corporate control benefits company managers or perhaps whether it is an avenue to maximise shareholder wealth. This study investigates 153 UK takeover prices for bids in the period 1990 to 1997. This period was picked because it coincides with the syndication of the Cadbury Report in 1992 when ever issues of corporate governance were elevated and prescriptive recommendations were made to safeguard shareholder investment. Through this study, outcomes based on the evaluation from the share selling price suggest that objectives of a takeover bid under-perform in the period prior to the put money. Accounting benefits also claim that targets under-perform in the same period and this is consistent with the view that takeovers execute a disciplinary function when property are reallocated to their most productive use. However , post bet share cost performance reveals modest improvement while accounting results suggest that managers of bidding firms fail to enhance the operating efficiency of the combined firm. The findings on this study therefore dispel the notion that takeover bids are created in shareholders' interests. The results suggest that UK takeovers are not disciplinary, but are performed to generate initial economic rewards to managers at the charge of shareholders. ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS my spouse and i

ABSTRACT 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS iii

LISTOFTABLES ni

LIST OF FIGURES (CHARTS) viii

CHAPTER you INTRODUCTION 1

1 . 1 STUDYOVERVIEW one particular

1 . a couple of MOTIVATION several

1 . 3 RESEARCH TARGETS 4

1 ) 4 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ANALYZE 5

1 . 5 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY a few

1 . 6th CHAPTER BUSINESS 6

CHAPTER 2 MOTIVES AND CLASSIFICATION OF

TAKEOVER BIDS several

2 . you CHAPTER TARGETS 7

installment payments on your 2 REASON FOR TAKEOVER BIDS 7

2 . several MOTIVES FOR DISCIPLINARY OFFERS 14

installment payments on your 4 CLASSIFICATION OF TAKEOVER BIDS AND DEVELOPMENT OF HYPOTHESES 17 2 . 5 REVIEW OF MARKET EVIDENCE 20

installment payments on your 6 REPORT ON ACCOUNTING EVIDENCE 27

2 . 7 SUMMARYAND CONCLUSIONS thirty five

CHAPTER a few SAMPLE AND METHODOLOGY 38

3. you CHAPTER TARGETS 38

iii

3. a couple of DESCRIPTION OF INFORMATION AND TEST SELECTION 38

3. several EVENT RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 43

3. four MODELS TO GET GENERATING REGULAR RETURNS 46

3. a few ABNORMAL OVERALL PERFORMANCE 52

3. 6 STATISTICAL TESTING 52

3. several PITFALLS OF CUMULATIVE ABNORMAL RETURNS

TECHNIQUE 54

several. 8 WORKING PERFORMANCE 56

3. on the lookout for DISTINGUISHING OPERATING CASH FLOW VIA...

Bibliography: Agrawal, A. J. F Jaffe and G. N. Mandelker (1992), ‘Post-merger Performance of Acquiring Firms: a Re-Examination of an Anomaly', Journal of Finance, forty seven, pp. 1605-1621.

Agrawal, A. & Jaffe, J. (1995) ‘Do takeover targets under-perform? Evidence by operating and stock returns', Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, volume. 38, no . 5, pp. 721-46.

Aitken, M. & Czernkowski, R. (1992), ‘Information leakage just before takeover bulletins: The effect of media reports', Accounting and Business Exploration, vol. 23, pp. 3-20.

Alchian, Armen A. (1950), Uncertainty, Development and Financial Theory', Diary of Politics Economy, Vol. 58, pp. 211-221.

Amihud, T. and B. Lev (1981), ‘Risk Reduction as being a Managerial Purpose for Conglomerate Merger', Bells Journal of Economics, Fall months 1981, pp. 605-617.

Amihud, T., W. Lev and N. G. Travlos (1990), Corporate Control and Range of Investment Auto financing: The Case of Corporate Acquisitions', Journal of Finance, Volume. XLV, Number 2, 06, pp. 603-616.

110

Arnold, G., (2005) The Guide of Corporate Finance, A company Comparison to Financial Markets Decisions and Techniques, Economical Times, Prentice Hall

Asquith, P (1983), ‘Merger Offers, Uncertainty, and Stockholder Returns', Journal Economics, 11, pp. 51-84

Asquith, P

Avkiran, N. T. 1999, ‘The evidence about efficiency profits: The role of mergers and the rewards to the public', Journal of Banking and Finance, vol. 23, pp. 991-1013.

Baker, R. M. and R. J. Limmack (1999), ‘UK Takeovers and Bidding Organization Wealth Adjustments: The Impact of Survivorship and also other Potential Variety Biases on Post Final result Performance', Doing work Paper, College or university of Stirling, Jan.

Barber, B. and John T. Lyon (1996) ‘Detecting Unusual Operating Performance: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics' Journal of economic Economics, forty one, pp. 359-399

Barber, Mike M

Baumol, W. T (1959), Business Behaviour, Benefit and Growth. New York: Macmillan

Berger, P and At the

Berle, A. and G. Means (1936), The Modern Company and Private Real estate. The Macmillan Company

Bhagat, Shleifer and Vishny (1990), ‘The Post occurences of Inhospitable Takeovers', Brookings Papers of Economic Activity, Microeconomics, pp

Bishop, S. R. (1991) ‘Pre-bid acquisitions and substantial shareholder notices', Australian Record of Supervision, vol. sixteen, pp. 1-33.

Bishop, S i9000., Dodd, S. & Officer, R. Ur. (1987) Aussie Takeovers: The evidence, The Center pertaining to Independent Research, St . Leonards, N. S. W.

Bradley, M., M. Desai and E. L. Kim (1983), The rationale Lurking behind Inter firm Tender Gives: Information or perhaps Synergy', Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 11, pp. 183-206.

Bradley, M., D. Desai and Elizabeth. H. Kim (1988), Synergistic Gains by Corporate Purchases and their Department between the Shareholders of Concentrate on and Obtaining Firms, Diary of Financial Economics, 21 (1) pp. 3-40.

Brearly and Myers (2000) Principles of Corporate Financial, McGraw-Hill Worldwide 6th Edition

Brown, S

Brown, G. & de uma Silva Rosado, R. (1998), ‘Research method and the long-run performance of acquiring firms', Australian Diary of Administration, Vol. 23, pp. 23-38.

Brown, T. J. and J. W. Warner (1980), ‘Measuring Security Price Performance', Journal of Financial Economics, sixteen, pp. 3-31.

Bugeja, M. & Walt, T. (1995), ‘An empirical analysis of some determinants of the concentrate on shareholder premium in takeover bids', Accounting and Financial, vol. thirty five, no . two, pp. 33-60.

Cadbury, A., (1992) " Codes of best practice”, " Record from the committee on monetary aspects of business governance” London, uk, Gee Posting

Casey, R., Dodd, G

Caves, Ur. (1989), ‘Takeovers and Financial Efficiency: Experience VS Hindsight', International Log of Industrial Business, 7, pp. 151-174.

Chatterjee, R. and G. Meeks (1996), ‘The Financial Associated with Takeover Accounting Rates and Return and Accounting Regulation', Journal of Business Fund and Accounting, 23 (5) and (6), July, pp. 851-868.

Chatterjee, S. (1986), ‘Types of Synergy and economic Benefit: The Impact of Acquisitions on Merging and Rival Firms', Strategic Administration Journal, six, pp. 119-139.

Choi, M. and G. Philippatos (1983), ‘Synergism or perhaps Diversification: Is Merger Desirable', The Journal of Financial Exploration, 6 (3), Fall, pp. 239-256.

Clark simon, K. and Eli Ofek (1994), Mergers as a Means of Restructuring Affected Firms: An Empirical Investigation', Journal of economic and quantitative Analysis. 113

Coase, Ronald H

Brief review, R. and G. A. Jarrell (1995), ‘Corporate Emphasis and Share Returns', Journal of Financial Economics, 37, pp. 67-87.

Cornett, M. Meters. and L. Tehranian (1992), ‘Changes in Corporate Efficiency Associated with Bank Acquisitions', Diary of Financial Economics 31, pp 211-234

Cosh, A

Cowling, Keith (1980) Mergers and Economic Overall performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Dahya, The writer, (2002) " The Cadbury Committee, Company Performance and Top Managing Turnover, ” Journal of Finance, Vol

Dahya, Jay, and Ronan Powell, (1998), Multinational Financial Journal, Vol. 2 Best. pp1-19

114

Denis, Deb. J. and D. T. Denis (1995), ‘Performance Adjustments Following Best Management Dismissals, ' Journal of Finance, Vol. 60, No . some, pp. 1029-1057.

Dennis, G. K. and John T. McConnell (1986), ‘Active Shareholders and Managing Takeover Pursuing Unsuccessful Control Contests, ' Journal of economic Economics, 18 pp. 143-187.

Dennis, G. J., and J. M. Serrano, (1996) " Effective Investors and Management Proceeds Following Lost Control Competitions. ” Journal of Financial Economics, 40, no . 2 pp. 239-266.

Dickerson, A. and H. Gibson and At the. Tsakalotos (1997), ‘The Influence of Purchases on Company Performance: Evidence from a huge Panel of UK firms', Oxford Financial Papers, forty-nine, July, pp. 344-361.

Dietrich, J. K. and E. Sorensen (1984), ‘An Application of Logit Examination to Conjecture of Merger Targets', Diary of Organization Research 12, pp. 393-402.

Dimson, Electronic. and Paul Marsh (1986), ‘Event Study Methodologies and the Size Result: The Case of UK Press Recommendation', Journal of Financial Economics, 17, pp. 113-142.

Dodd, P, & R. Ruback (1977), ‘Tender Offers and Stockholder Comes back: An Scientific analysis', Diary of Financial Economics, 5 12 ,, pp. 351-374.

Dodd, P. (1980), ‘Merger Proposals, Supervision Discretion and Stockholder Wealth', Journal of economic Economics, almost 8, pp. 105-138.

Dodds, T. and T. Quek (1985), ‘Effects of Mergers around the Share Selling price Movement of the Acquiring Firms: A UK study', Record of Organization Finance and Accounting, 12, pp. 285-296.

115

Donaldson, Gordon (1984), Managing Corporate Wealth, Praeger

Eddey, S. H. 1991, ‘Corporate Raiders and Takeover Target', Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, volume. 18, pp. 151-71.

Ellert, J. C., (1976) " Mergers, Anti Trust Law Enforcement and Stockholder Returns” Journal of Financing 31, no . 2, pp 715-732

Fama, E

Reputacion, E. and K. R. French (1995), ‘Size and Book to promote Factors in Earnings and Returns', Journal of Fund, 50, pp. 131-155.

Juicio, E. Farrenheit. L. Fisher, Mc Jensen, R. Roll (1969) " The Modification of Inventory Price to New Information', International Economical Review, twelve, p. 1-21.

Fama, Electronic. F. and M. C. Jensen (1983), ‘Separation of Ownership and Control', Record of Legislation and Economics, 26, 06, pp. 301-324.

Firth, Meters. (1979), ‘The Profitability of Takeovers and Mergers', Monetary Journal, fifth there�s 89, pp. 316-328.

Firth, Meters. (1980) " Takeovers, Shareholders Returns, as well as the Theory from the Firm, ” Quarterly Record of Economics, 94, pp. 235-60

Franks, J., T

Franks, M. and L. Harris (1989), ‘Shareholder Prosperity Effects of Corporate Takeovers: the united kingdom Experience 1955-85', Journal of economic Economics, 23, pp. 225-49.

Franks, Julian, and Lieu noir Mayer, mil novecentos e noventa e seis, Hostile Takeovers and Bureaucratic Failure, Record of Financial Economics 40, 163-181

116

Franks, J. R. Harris and S. Titman (1991), ‘The Post-Merger Talk about Price Functionality of Purchasing Firms', Journal of Financial Economics, 29, pp. 81-96.

Ghosh, Aloke (1998), ‘Does Accounting Based Functionality Really Boost Following Corporate and business Acquisitions', Working Paper Zicklin School of Business, Baruch College (CUNY), New York, UNITED STATES.

Ghosh, Aloke (2001), ‘Does Accounting Structured Performance Really Improve Following Corporate Acquisitions', Journal of Corporate Finance 7: 151 – 178

Gregory, A

Grossman, S. and U. Hart (1981), ‘The Share role of Takeover Prices for bids in Circumstance of Uneven Information', Log of Fund, 36, pp. 253-270.

Halpern, Paul (1983), ‘Corporate Acquisitions: A Theory of Exceptional Cases? An assessment Event Research Applies to Acquisitions', Journal of Finance, 38, pp. 297-317.

Hartford, Jarrad (1999), ‘Corporate Cash Reserves and Acquisitions', Journal of Financing, Vol. 54, No . 6, Dec. pp. 1969-1997.

Hay, Donald A. and Person S. Liu (1998), ‘When Do Firms Go In For Expansion for Acquisitions, ' Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Might, V. 62, N. two, pp. 143-164.

Healy, L. K. Palepu and 3rd there�s r. Ruback (1992), ‘Does Business Performance Boost after Mergers? ' Record of Financial Economics, 31, pp. 135-75.

Higson, C. (1990), ‘The choice of Accounting Technique in UK Mergers and Acquisitions', London: Research Table of the Company of Chartered Accountants in the uk and Wales.

Higson, C. and Elliot (1998), Post takeover Returns: The UK evidence', Journal of Empirical Fund, 5, pp. 27-46

117

Holl, P. and M. F. Pickering (1988), ‘Determinants and Effects of Actual, Forgotten and Contested Mergers', Bureaucratic and Decision Economics, 9, pp. 1-19.

Hubbard, R. and G. Palia (1995), ‘Benefits of Control, Managerial Ownership as well as the Stock Returns of Obtaining firms', Flanke Journal of Economics, Volume. 26, No . 4k, Winter months, pp. 782-792.

Hughes A (1993), ‘Mergers and Financial Performance in UK: A Survey of the Empirical Facts 1950 – 1990', in M. Bishop and T. Kay (ed. ) Euro Mergers and Merger Policy, Oxford College or university Press: Oxford, pp. 9-95.

Hughes, A., D. C. Mueller and A. Singh (1980) in Determinants and Effects of Mergers (D. C. Mueller Ed), Cambridge.

Hyde, C. E. 2002, ‘Evaluating mergers in the Australian petroleum industry', The Economic Record, vol. 78, pp. 299-311.

Ibbotson, Ur. G. (1975), ‘Price Efficiency of Prevalent Stock New Issues', Journal of Financial Economics, 3, pp. 235-272.

Jarrel, S. (1995), The Long term Performance of Corporate Takeovers: An Improved Benchmark Methodology', Operating Paper University of Chi town, Chicago

Jarrell, G. A

Jarrell, G. A., Adam A. Brickley and Jeffrey M. Kurzer (1988), ‘The Market pertaining to Corporate Control: The Empirical Evidence Since 1980', Log of Financial Perspectives, two, pp. 49-68.

Jensen, Michael jordan C., 1988, Takeovers: All their Causes and Consequences, Record of Economical Perspectives 2, 21-48

118

Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling (1976), ‘Theory with the Firm: Bureaucratic Behaviour, Firm Costs and Ownership Structure', Journal of Financial Economics, 3, September, pp. 305-360.



Experimental Willpower of the Formula of Magnesium Oxide Essay

Related

Category

News